OldMadBrit
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2006
- Location
- East Bay
- Moto(s)
- 99 Frankenbike R1 - sold
03 Caponord ETV - sold
17 R1M - sold
16 Tuono 1100F
18 KTM 390 Duke
- Name
- Steve
It got political the instant someone mentioned HIV.
Ah, pish posh. The whole POINT of being a parent is that you're making choices for your child in which they have precisely ZERO say, and of which they have even less understanding. In the grand view of choices that my parents made for me before I got to the age of understanding, the decision to cut a bit of skin off the end of my dick rates pretty low on the scale of importance.
It's just more proof that society takes penises WAY too seriously. There are dozens of choices that parents make for their children that are FAR more important. Religion, exercise, nutrition, education, travel, etc.: all kinds of shit that has WAY more of an effect down the line than the appearance of their cock. When a parent overfeeds their child or lets them do nothing but sit around and play video games all day, it has a mutilating effect on both their physiology AND their psyche that makes the removal of a bit of flesh from their pecker look like a non-issue, but NOONE is up in arms about making it illegal for a parent to let their kid turn into a fat slob.
I don't see anybody arguing with you about the need to educate your kid about healthy lifestyles.
So where does preemptive mutilation fit in to this? What's so impossibly difficult for the pro-cut lobby to simply wait until their kid reaches puberty and then let him decide?
If pre-emptive mutilation is so important to you, why not remove your kids:
feet - lest they ever trip up?
ears - so they hear no evil?
eyes - so no harmful image disturbs them?
why not remove your infant daughter's breasts to save her from breast cancer?


