• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

DUNE

Karbon

Hyper hoñorary
Joined
Sep 27, 2006
Location
Santa Cruizin'
Moto(s)
superchicken, BRP SM, GSXR750
It's doooopppppeee!

Gotta watch it in the theaters if it's possible. Aside from the killer cinematography, world building, and set designs, audio is such a big component of it.

It's in HBO max streaming fyi.
 
Watching in a couple hours on HBO. I can't ride/drive to the theater with a foot injury so VR headset is next best thing.

I've heard good things from friends that have watched it already.
 
Watching in a couple hours on HBO. I can't ride/drive to the theater with a foot injury so VR headset is next best thing.

I've heard good things from friends that have watched it already.

Rad. Make sure your audio has good bass response. It's a real treat.
 
Saw it in the theater last night and it was glorious. As a fan of the book, they nailed a lot of it. I understand leaving some parts and not explaining everything out due to time.

The casting...OMG, they got it so right.

Sounds like they are going to make the second half of the book.

Still kind of processing it all. Will watch it on HBO Max with captions on because everyone seemed to be whispering. LOL
 
I guess because of the release, they showed the old lame one last night and I actually kind of forced myself to watch it, having seen that post about all this intellectual stuff about it...

Looking forward to seeing new one.
 
Watched the HBOMax Dune last night and they nailed it. I then watched some of the original 1985 Dune. That was like watching a cheap porn film from the 70's. The new Dune is what the book needed.
 
The old one hurt to watch when it came out in the 80's, but I've never been that much of a David Lynch fan.

Sting was rather punchable, though.
 
The old one hurt to watch when it came out in the 80's.

It sure did. Always loved the books and figured after that fiasco of a movie it was just too big a story for a movie. Will give this one a try I guess.
 
Watched last night with the wife. When it was over, we both looked at each other and said "that's it?" I liked the CGI but felt the story was lacking and was told in bits n pieces, rather than in a more smooth, complete way.

Hopefully part two will be made; I guess it depends upon how much money part one makes. I would expect to see it three years hence.
 
Dune. Yes. Watched it on Thursday and again tonight. Will most likely watch it a good 5 times before I’ve had my fill.

And looking forward to seeing it in IMAX at some point.
 
Last edited:
Enjoyed it, but disappointed they haven't even started on part 2.
 
Absolutely worth the IMAX experience. Damn, what a flick!
 
Saw it in the theater last night and it was glorious. As a fan of the book, they nailed a lot of it. I understand leaving some parts and not explaining everything out due to time.

The casting...OMG, they got it so right.

Sounds like they are going to make the second half of the book.

Still kind of processing it all. Will watch it on HBO Max with captions on because everyone seemed to be whispering. LOL

I don't think the bits they omitted detracted at all from the story. If anything, it helped pacing.
 
I guess I’ll have to be the sole contrarian here. I never read any of the books. I watched it on HBO Max. I was underwhelmed. The pace of the movie was painfully slow for me. With that pace, I would have expected more character development. I honestly didn’t really care about any characters in the movie.
 
This movie was definitely intended for fans of the book.
 
Well, allow me to preface by saying I am not a Frank Herbert fan boy. I read the first book like 30 years ago, enjoyed it mildly and saw no reason to continue down that fiction path.

That being said, I did and still do very much enjoy the David Lynch film. I did enjoy this new version, however the primary benefit of this new version is that it has modern special effects that the film from 40 years ago didn't have. Visually in that way, it is much more impressive.

That seems to be the greatest advantage. The acting seemed to me to be passable.

Jason Moamoa's Duncan Idaho is an upgrade over the dude from the Lynch film, whose name I can't even remember, and is the most enjoyasble performance in the film, but quite frankly, it is just Jason Moamoa being Jason Momoa.

Josh Brolin's Gurney is an improvement over Patrick Stewart's which to me is a more significant performance showing.

Jurgen Procnow's Duke Atreides was wildly better than this one.

The kid playing Paul Atreides just lacks the physical and screen presence for me to think I will ever buy him as the Kwisatz Haderach. Like Kyle Maclachan wasn't a show stopping presence, but at least he was 6', so when he stood up in a stillsuit, he actually looked imposing against those other actors. The kid they have playing him now looks young, scrawny, and small. He does not posses the Tom Cruise intensity a pretty little thing like that needs to play The Boss Hoss.

The largest disappointment has to be Stellan Skarsgard as Baron Harkonen, for whom Ken McMillan gave one of the most fascinating and horrifying performances as a villain to grace the screens of any 80's film, which is a pretty impressive ensemble. I 100% blame the director for this as I had every confidence in his ability to take on the role and shine.

My curently hope is that the plan is to build up the horror of Baron Harkonen based on the story arc where we were left in this first picture and that he will be given more opportunity to shine in the 2nd picture.

Similarly, I really liked the casting of Dave Bautista as Raban, but he also seemed horridly underutilized. I also hope as we get into the next phase, he will be given an opportunity to show his talents.

From a witting perspective, the only real improvement I saw was the portrayal of the Sardaukar, which I felt didn't really get any playing time in the Lynch film and in this version was both visually impressive and an interesting piece of the story to watch.


All in all, I enjoyed it and would recommend fans of the scifi genre all see it, but it very, very much does not live up to the hype I have been hearing for over a year.

This is without a question, not a stand alone film, and as far as I can tell, really the whole trilogy or whatever they are planning will have to unfold before a proper judgement can be made on this portrayal of the fiction.
 
Enjoyed it, but disappointed they haven't even started on part 2.

I’m not. Timothy needs some time to “put on a little muscle.”

I realize he’s supposed to be the desert mouse but, c’mon, he has to look older in the second half. IIRC he spent years in the desert with the Fremen before they took it to the Harkonnens. It took years to pull all the Fremen sietches together under him as their leader.
 
I don't think the bits they omitted detracted at all from the story. If anything, it helped pacing.

Same here. I’d add that there was little left out. Things that had to be put down in text were constructed visually thats why ill be watching it several more times.

As bad as the OG was they got an awful lot right too until the money ran out. It captured the awe of the spice, Arrakis, and the Makers.
 
That was half the book? Seemed like a third to me.

Dune is probably my favorite book or anthology…if I had to choose a single favorite.
I love that everything is in there, religion, politics, philosophy.

I traveled hours in 1985 from my village in rural Scotland to Glasgow to see the Lynch film, dragging along a bunch of my budfies who weren’t familiar with Dune at all.
At the end, they all looked at me like I had stolen a day of their lives.

The SciFi series was pretty damn good.

I eagerly awaited the delayed release of this one. I was not disappointed.
Visually good, they hit on significant parts of the story including a sort of explanation of details. Lynch used a ton of voice overs trying to do this and it was distracting.
It seemed this version didn’t attempt to show the unexplanable like Guild navigators “folding space”.

The acting wasn’t forced (for the most part) and the characters fit, more or less. Agree about the Paul casting. That was as poor a choice as the Mitch Rapp casting in “American Assasin”.
Bautista definitely underutilized. Hope we get more of him IF they shoot another movie.

My wife doesn’t read and certainly wouldn’t ever read Dune. I explained to her that the story is very complex and if lost she should ask me for clarification. (It’s Mexico. Talking, answering phones, texting that blinds the people behind you, all part of the norm here.).
She liked it but felt a bit lost at the begining.

Chani could have been hotter.
 
Back
Top