As long as he can learn from the experience, I think he'll be just fine.

The Duke has less horsepower than an SV650, which is commonly recommended as a good beginner bike. It also has a broad, torquey (not peaky) powerband that's easy to ride. In general, it's a pretty forgiving bike compared to pretty much anything out there, besides maybe a Ninja 250 (which not everybody wants to ride and which has lots of breakable bodywork). The issue here is NOT the bike. The OP made an error, or series of errors which have already been discussed. As long as he can learn from the experience, I think he'll be just fine.
Reminder: The Crash Analysis Forum was created with the intent of helping people learn from mistakes. The discussion should be centered around mental and physical skills that motorcyclists can use to avoid similar situations.
The following statements are not realistic or productive:
"sell your bike and get something smaller, slower, etc."
"Go buy a dirtbike and practice in the dirt for a few years before riding on the street"
"Ride your own ride"
Shouldn't we be providing the OP (and readers) specific skills that they can easily understand, and immediately apply when they ride (and drive) again?

I could not disagree more regarding the dirtbike advice. Been riding and racing dirt and street most of my life. Having the dirt experience, I can tell you that my recomendation for him to practice in the dirt FIRST is THE BEST ADVICE anyone can ever give him. PERIOD. You can debate whether his street bike is too torquey, too fast, too this and too that. But there is no debating the fact that gaining skill and confidence in the dirt is THE BEST thing he could ever do for learning to ride and stay alive in the street.
BTW- my original post where I recommended that he practice in the dirt first has been deleted. Is that standard protocal here on BARF....someone sees a post that they dont agree with and delete it??![]()
You are completely missing the point. I agree that dirtbike experience is valuable and useful. The issue here is that most riders do not have the ability to spend $1k or more for a dirtbike, $500 or more for the gear, and $2K or more for a transport vehicle.
Can you give them advice they can use immediately, advice that doesn't require a large financial investment?
No, it's standard practice in the Crash Analysis Forum. If it isn't analysis of the crash, it doesn't fit in the CA forum.
Disagree: It is advice that he can do now. He can pick up a beater for next to nothing, he could sell his bike (that is obviously too much for him at this stage) and get a dirt bike and a more suitable street bike for what he could get for his current bike, etc, etc, etc,.
Anyways, I think my advice was appropriate; I analized his crash and gave him my advice. He can take it or leave it. But deleting my post was:on your part. Just sayin'
OK, you may have analyzed the crash, but you did not share that here.
I understand your opinion, but it doesn't fit in with the rules of the Crash Analysis Forum.
Let's make the assumption that the OP does not have the $ to go purchase a dirtbike. Are you able to give him some advice that he can use immediately?
Wasn't there a post or three about changing what bike to ride?You are completely missing the point. I agree that dirtbike experience is valuable and useful. The issue here is that most riders do not have the ability to spend $1k or more for a dirtbike, $500 or more for the gear, and $2K or more for a transport vehicle.
Can you give them advice they can use immediately, advice that doesn't require a large financial investment?
No, it's standard practice in the Crash Analysis Forum. If it isn't analysis of the crash, it doesn't fit in the CA forum.
(Post 47 which also addresses riding on dirt first)Seems any discussion about how to avoid this in the future, is not in the rules of the forum. Discussion on how to improve one's skills as he/she gains experience on a motorcycle AFTER THE CRASH has been going on uncontested before the suggestion of buying a dirt bike. Evidently suggesting other streetable bikes is ok, just not a dirt bikeThis forum will be moderated with an eye to keep it informational as we do in the Keith Code thread. It is not for flaming and making fun or riddiculing, but rather to insight thought about the crash.. or the near crash. TO understand why.. how it might have been avoided etc.. to help others or the one who fell understand the WHY..
His bike doesn't have that.
You sure? I haven't checked the manual but Google found this:
Speaking of which, as soon as your Duke is broken in, find the little switch that selects the engine mapping and go for position #2 (full power and full response, all the time). I didn't like position #3 (softened response). The computer felt like it was fighting with the engine, and there was a definite increase in power at 5,000 rpm. Now it kicks everywhere, from idle on up. Note: avoid position #1, which limits top end power as well as softening throttle response.
Read more: http://www.visordown.com/reader-art...-on-riding-the-ktm-690/618.html#ixzz1tHDhc4kE
What year bike is it? Here is a post from 2008 with the switch location: http://www.ktmforums.com/forums/duke/170-690-duke-map-select-switch.html#post368
Edit: just read the original post... 2000 MY. Never-mind (Gilda Radner voice) I know nothing.
Sorry but you should have starting riding with a more forgiving bike that doesn't lift the front wheel easily. I think your way over your head. Get something to learn on and LIVE.
The Duke has less horsepower than an SV650, which is commonly recommended as a good beginner bike. It also has a broad, torquey (not peaky) powerband that's easy to ride. In general, it's a pretty forgiving bike compared to pretty much anything out there, besides maybe a Ninja 250 (which not everybody wants to ride and which has lots of breakable bodywork). The issue here is NOT the bike. The OP made an error, or series of errors which have already been discussed. As long as he can learn from the experience, I think he'll be just fine.
looks like we need to work on moderating consistency and double standards. These don't seem to fall within your guidelines. Just sayin'You know, that applies to so many things in life.![]()