how bad of a person are you?

[SFMCjohn]

ime, teh wonderful BARF poli-sink is a genteel tea party compared to the thin skins in our KS.

for example, I’m way too much of a delicate flower for BARF KS rough-n-tumble.

 

[augustiron]

D*ckbutt

 

[lizard]

As I've gotten older, I've become a better person.

Yesterday I had a road rage issue in the San Ramon Target parking lot. I contemplated slicing the asshole's lower radiator hose while he shopped. But other than security cameras stopping me, I channeled Jocko Willink (just walk away).

Though the Bible teaches us that God created us in his image, I'm morally bad.

Can my mom see my immoral ways from Heaven?

 

[two wheel tramp]

I found out yesterday that the ride I was in benefits at risk youth so I’m gonna change my answer to “I’m good.”

 

[GAJ]

ime, teh wonderful BARF poli-sink is a genteel tea party compared to the thin skins in our KS.

I'd have to agree.

 

[Rtmac]

I give money to homeless people if they ask me nicely. If they're not nice, I play fake-deaf.

 

[littlebeast]

Well, that whole weird function sounded like a lot of projected self reflection, so maybe he was/is Catholic?

you’re very frequently the adult in the room. that said, this is a bit uncharacteristically beneath you. not that’s there’s a detectable floor lol.

if i haven’t said it lately, adore you, babe.

Ha, you're just trolling because you're here feigning hippie love immediately after being an angry frat boi bro in the other thread and getting called out for that comedic short memory hypocrisy, but if you want to know the specifics, it's because I judge berto overall as being a person of low quality character because of his political thirsts and desires and he thinks he should be able to compartmentalize that morality without judgement elsewhere, i.e. it's just business, it's just politics, it's only when I'm in cambodia.

berto and i disagree on many (many) things. misguided in a few of his opinions? yes, imo. but i’ll fight anyone who suggests he is a ‘person of low quality character’. like, cage-match style fight.

 

[Butch]

ime, teh wonderful BARF poli-sink is a genteel tea party compared to the thin skins in our KS.

for example, I’m way too much of a delicate flower for BARF KS rough-n-tumble.

Me too. Glad I mod the PolSink 2.0 and not here.

 

[byke]

you’re very frequently the adult in the room. that said, this is a bit uncharacteristically beneath you. not that’s there’s a detectable floor lol.

if i haven’t said it lately, adore you, babe.


berto and i disagree on many (many) things. misguided in a few of his opinions? yes, imo. but i’ll fight anyone who suggests he is a ‘person of low quality character’. like, cage-match style fight.

And that's the classic perspective of the opposing demographic, they dislike people that call out harmful people 10x more than the actual harmful people.

 

[augustiron]

I really don't understand what's going on here.

I'm good, and I'm horrible. So are all of you.

Depends how I'm feeling and what I let leak out.

Always striving to do better. Whatever that means.

 

[cheez]

 

[tuxumino]

well apparently I'm bad for posting this thread, cus it started such misconcernation. And apparently misconcernation isn't a real word so I'm bad at grammar also.

 

[ctwo]

You know, this thread is loaded, as in it's asking a loaded question, like asking a married man how long has he been beating his wife, presuming he beats his wife at all. Well, at least there's an I'm Good option, but not a remorseful bad option.

I feel like I'm being the worst person for the most noble reasons, and for selfish reasons too. That tears me on how I feel about it, but there will be dire consequences to bear, so there will be a sort of poetic justice. Unfortunately, while I shouldn't, I find that I also cannot, and now it's too late to change it without being equally as bad and face similar but opposite outcomes.

 

[greenmonster]

well apparently I'm bad for posting this thread, cus it started such misconcernation. And apparently misconcernation isn't a real word so I'm bad at grammar also.

Another way to look at it is that this thread is doing what a mirror does, or an X-ray. It shows the dirt on one's face or the internal brokenness.
The mirror or X-ray itself is not the villain, much like this thread is not.

 

[GAJ]

I'm a bad person.

Didn't ride the moto once last year.

 

[Eldritch]

Deeply offensive....dear lord, again from frat bro DON STURT NUN straight to "oh my goodness!".

I didn't bring him into a post about you. Read the post you quoted from lb and where it came from. You brought someone else's string into yours.

This is why I'm not on barf much anymore, because of the support system for the facade and the willful blindness to the other stuff that pokes its head out here and there.

I suppose I am just failing to see why you feel the opinions of mine in two threads are unable to easily coexist?

One is based on the use of force in self defense. The other is utterly unrelated to violence.

Where do you see conflict in the position?

You seem interested rather than taking only the pure written statement in the context of the thread as raw data, to be analyzed only within that context, and rather use said text to make some kind of bizarre character attack, based on whatever profile you have cobbled together from your limited online interactions with people.

Apologies if I am mistaken, but I just am having a hard time grasping where you are coming from here. You made the words, so clearly you want someone to see/hear them, I am just trying to understand your perspective as it seems wildly different from how I interact with the internet.

 

[ST Guy]

I consider myself to be a centered and good person. And that is much of the reason I can sit quietly on my front porch, listening to music, relaxing in the waning afternoon and simply enjoying what remains of my life.

 

[Wolf]

I'm a good person who has made some bad decisions.

 

[byke]

I suppose I am just failing to see why you feel the opinions of mine in two threads are unable to easily coexist?

One is based on the use of force in self defense. The other is utterly unrelated to violence.

Where do you see conflict in the position?

You seem interested rather than taking only the pure written statement in the context of the thread as raw data, to be analyzed only within that context, and rather use said text to make some kind of bizarre character attack, based on whatever profile you have cobbled together from your limited online interactions with people.

Apologies if I am mistaken, but I just am having a hard time grasping where you are coming from here. You made the words, so clearly you want someone to see/hear them, I am just trying to understand your perspective as it seems wildly different from how I interact with the internet.

Haha that's awesome, berto does that a bunch too, feigns confusion when getting caught in conflcit, pretty funny. Yeah it's all super confusing and complex, we're gonna need to analyze the raw data, look at the various aspects of vertical integration, and you know really investigate the ways that m1 and m2 supply affects roi on a global scale relative to their respective industries. Ahhh forget it, you wouldn't understand. Back to the bmw, men w/hairgel, and fancy watch forum I go...

 

[two wheel tramp]

I yelled at some clueless Lyft e-bike nerds and multiple jaywalkers yesterday.

I might be back to being bad.